|
Volume 3, Issue 13
June 21 - July 4, 2001
MOVIE REVIEW
LARA CROFT: TOMB RAIDER
Since day one, video games and movies
have never really worked well as a happy medium. Granted, for every diamond in the rough (Mortal
Kombat), there are two or three Wing
Commanders or Street Fighters on the
shelf. Lara Croft: Tomb Raider as a film
is tough call because it has its moments of
greatness, but unfortunately they are
heavily outnumbered by scenes that are
just plain dull.
For those of us who haven't been on
Earth for the last month, Angelina Jolie is
Lara Croft, a very wealthy archeologist
who is every man's dream. She is beautiful,
loves her motorcycles and sport cars
and has a gun collection that would make
Chuck Heston salivate. We find her in her
mansion practicing her survival techniques
against live robots which are programmed
to kill her. Aside from her toys,
Laura lives with her butler Hillary, and
her assistant/ robot designer, Bruce.
Laura's true goal in life is to uncover the
mystery of her father's disappearance.
She finally gets her chance when she discovers
a clock that her father had hidden
for her in their home. As it turns out, a
secret society, known as the Illuminati,
have been searching for this clock for
sometime. It holds the key to control
time, and this power can be utilized only
when all planets are aligned together
every 5,000 years, which is occurring in
the film. After realizing Croft holds the
key to time, the Illuminati steal it from
her and head over to Cambodia where
they must continue with their mission.
Croft has a choice, either she can let the
Illuminati continue on its quest for eternal
power, or she can tag along and help,
doing what is right in the end.
Tomb Raider takes the viewer to different
locations from the jungles of Cambodia
to frozen areas in Iceland. However, once
inside the temples of these locations, it's
quite obvious we are in a studio filming a
movie.
Jolie seems uncomfortable as Croft, partly
because of the super sized bra she has
to strap on and run around in. She, more
than anyone, realizes that she isn't going
to win another Oscar here, so her performance is half-baked; she is strictly eye
candy for the viewers. Besides Jolie and
Jon Voight, most of the cast is filmed with
no name British actors who are in the film
to take up space.
Personally, I have played Tomb Raider a
handful of times, and I'd like to say this
film does the game no justice. It took four
people to write the story for this film. The
last time I heard of four people working
on a script, it was for Godzilla, and we all
know how good that film was.
As for the casting, Jennifer Love Hewitt
should have been Croft. She resembles
her in everyway, from her facial features
all the way to her natural curves. The producers
made the mistake of picking Jolie
over Hewitt because of the Oscar recognition.
Give me a break. No one is coming
to see this because Jolie has the Oscar
clout; they're coming to see explosions
and to catch Jolie climb walls in super
tight shorts. C---
Neal James
Movie Review
THE FAST AND
THE FURIOUS
The Fast and the Furious is a dumb movie.
The dialogue is hackneyed, the cinematography is
over-done, and the acting is forgettable. And all of these contribute
to why it is so fun to watch.
This is a barebones action movie, and a
rather enjoyable one at that. The action is
almost nonstop, the car chases and
crashes are impressive, and there is plenty
of eye-candy. If you want to give your
brain a rest and watch 100 minutes of
explosions, scantily clad women, and fast
cars, this is time well spent in the theater.
After all, isn't that what a summer movie
should be? No pretension, no attempts to
have some added depth, just a fun show
to watch with flat soda and over-buttered
popcorn.
The only thing The Fast and the Furious
doesn't do is spell out who fits where on
the good vs. evil chart. We know who
we're supposed to cheer for, but the
movie keeps its audience guessing as to
who is behind the hijacking spree in the
opening sequence. Which is just as well,
because beyond that there isn't much in
the way of plot. Other than a couple stock
characters brooding at each other and trying
to win each other's love or respect,
the storyline sits in the back seat of the
fast cars the movie centers around.
There are a couple unexpected twists
early on, but we obviously aren't talking
about The Usual Suspects here. Most of it
goes along the lines of learning something
seemingly bad about a character,
then learning why it was justified within
the next five minutes. Vin Diesel's character
is given some moral ambiguity, but
not enough to ever make him seem like
one of the villains.
Diesel and the rest of the cast say their
lines, have the occasional emotion, and
generally try to look cool while the camera's
pointed at them. Hey, if acting were
a requirement for action movies, would
Schwarzenegger be a household name?
The closest anyone comes is Chad
Lindberg as a mechanical genius with
Attention Deficit Disorder that keeps him
from doing anything else with his life
(sort of a milder version of the idiot
savant).
With the exception of a few middle-aged
cops, the cast reads like a menu of young
stars, most of whom probably won't get
far beyond this kind of empty but entertaining
movie. Where a bunch of barely
employed twentysomethings find the
money to beef up their cars like they do in
this movie is beyond me. So is how they
can afford to bet $2,000 on the races. Yes,
the whole point of the thin plot is that
some of these people are stealing expensive
toys, but not all of them. The drag
racers are the good guys, remember? So
what if their favorite past time gets the
police after them more often than not, or
if they prevent pizza boys from delivering
their precious cargo (one of the
movie's more desperate product placements).
So what it all boils down to is that The
Fast and the Furious won't win any big
awards, it won't make the dramatic
careers of anyone in it, and it won't be
remembered a year from now. What it
will do, however, is provide an hour and
40 minutes of kinetic energy in an air
Movie Review
HIMALAYA
A straight description of this film
might make you sleepy. It's about
some Nepalese villagers making their
annual pilgrimage through the mountains
to trade salt for grain. They bring lots of
yaks with them.
To see the film is much different, because
under the humble Discovery Channel
premise lies a simple yet rooted tale about
the passages that bind all people.
Tinle (Thilen Lhondup) is an aged chief
of a tribe of salt trekkers. When the son of
an enemy tribe, Karma (Gurgon Kyap),
shows up with Tinle's dead son on the
back of his yak, Tinle blames him for his
son's death. The headstrong Karma sticks
around, and there is building tension
between him and the stubborn, cantankerous
Tinle. Tinle decides that in place of
his son, he will resume leading the yak
caravan into the hills to secure the future
of his people. Thinking that Tinle is too
old to make the journey, Karma wants to
accompany him on his expedition, but
Tinle refuses to allow it. So Karma gathers
up yaks and some of the tribesman
and heads off into the hills before Tinle is
set to go. Tinle in turn gathers up his
monk son, Norbou (Karma Tensing
Nyima Lama), his grandson and heir to
the yak skin throne, Passang (Karma
Wangel), his widowed daughter-in-law
Pema, and a few others-- and yaks-- and
chases after Karma.
From here this movie takes an epic turn,
both in the cinematography and thematically.
These two developments work in a
contrasting nature with one another, and
the result is quite moving. There are complex
shots made in all kinds of harsh conditions
during this expedition that took
life-threatening weeks to set up-- the
results are incredible. Then there is the
simple humanity of the story. The transitions
that Tinle and Karma undergo as
they begin to accept each other's ways
would be considered cliché in traditional
American cinema. As it is though, the
characters simply beam in their respective
positions. The vital nature of their
expedition, and the constant struggles to
survive on the trek are instrumental in
giving the plot its intense gravity.
The credibility and breadth of the movie
could be attributed to the fact that these
people are essentially playing themselves.
Director Eric Valli, a writer and
photographer for National Geographic,
forged a friendship with these people on
assignment back in the early '80s. Upon
seeing The Seventh Samurai with Valli,
some of them actually suggested that he
use the medium of film to document their
lives. With exception of Lhakpa
Tsamchoe, who plays Pema in the film
and appeared in Seven Years in Tibet,
none of these people had been on camera
before, although this fact is never really
apparent-- the film flows like the slice of
nature that it really is.
Valli has total access to these people,
their lifestyle, and their ceremonies,
which also contributes to the success of
the picture. This film proves that even
across the globe, people still share the
same problems and emotions-- and that
the name Karma is the Nepalese equivalent
of John. B+
--Josh Tyson
Movie Review
SWORDFISH
I mentioned to a friend that I was going
to see John Travolta's new film Swordfish, and
her response was, "Don't you mean Swordfight?" I find her
response humorous, simply because I
didn't realize how much testosterone the
producers pumped into the making of this
film (after all, Warner Brothers did pay
Halle Berry $500,000 extra to show her
breasts in the movie). This film is about
fast cars, fast women and even faster
Internet connections. Are you ready to
log on?
Hugh Jackman is Stanley, a one-time
super hacker who has been released from
his two-year prison term. All he wants is
to set his life straight and gain custody of
his daughter who resides with his wealthy
ex-wife cum porn actress. To do this, he
needs money he doesn't have, which is
how we are introduced to John Travolta's
character, Gabriel.
Gabriel is a spy who lives like a rock
star-- fast cars and fast women surround
his home. Gabriel offers Stanley $10 million
to help him seize unused government
funds that have been collecting dust for
dozens of years. As we delve into
Gabriel's character, we learn that he isn't
working alone, rather hand in hand with a
dirty senator, and they intend in using
these funds to purchase nuclear weapons.
Swordfish also stars Don Cheadle as tenacious
special agent Roberts who is on
Gabriel and Stanley's trail, and Halle Berry
as Ginger, Gabriel's stunning assistant.
This film is supposed to be Travolta's
third or fourth comeback film. I doubt if
it will do him the justice he is seeking.
The impression I got was that the studio
gave Travolta three really nice suits and
he came in and filmed all his scenes within
two weeks. His character is filled with
the same cheesy lines from Face/ Off, but
without the substance.
Director Dominic Sena is the man
responsible of Swordfish as well as last
year's Gone in 60 Seconds. Educated
viewers will pick up on the fact that both
of his films play out like twins of each
other. Both films involve a one-time
criminal who is trying to stay clean but
must break the law again for a family
member. Also, both of these films try to
justify that breaking the law is okay as
long as there's a legitimate reason behind
your actions.
Since the characters and plot have all been
cut and pasted from other films, Swordfish
wears out its welcome 40 minutes into the
movie. What could have been a great
opportunity to introduce viewers to the
world of computer hacking, turns out to
be a been-there done-that version of other
films we've already seen. C
--Neal James
DVD REPORT
BLACK CAESAR (1973)
Writer/director Larry Cohen became a cult icon the hard way. Which is by making genre films that are consistently better and certainly more original than those put out by almost any other exploitation filmmaker.
Rent a Cohen film-- whether it's Q, or It's Alive or
Maniac Cop-- and you're bound to discover one of
those pleasant surprises hid amongst the copious junk
sitting on the shelves of your local video store.
Black Caesar is a Blaxploitation update of the classic
Warner Brothers' gangster films of the '30s. (Most
obviously, the title is a riff on Little Caesar.) Like those
movies, this one is rather episodic in nature. We first
meet the title character as a young teen. Apparently
working as a shoe shine, we quickly see that he's actually
setting up a street killing. Soon afterward he's savagely
beaten by an evil racist street cop and sent to
prison. Before going in, he states his intention of learning
the trade from professionals, as it were, before he
returns to the streets.
Eight years later he's back, now played by the extremely
suave Fred Williamson. Williamson is absolutely terrific here, in what is probably his best movie. Soon he's
the first black hood working for the Mob, which he subsequently
betrays. In quick fashion he becomes the
neighborhood crime boss, but learns the old lesson
about what his money and power can't buy.
The film is more interested in the machinations of how
Williamson seizes power than it is in violence, although
there's certainly plenty of that. Meanwhile, Cohen is,
for a white guy especially, fearless in going for the
throat regarding racial matters. You can't imagine this
film being made today, that's for sure.
The disc's big gun is a marvelous commentary track by
Larry Cohen. This is one of the most educational lectures
on low-budget filmmaking I've heard. The number
of scenes shot in or outside Cohen's house, for
instance, proves rather substantial. Moreover, when we
see Williamson toss some fur coats out of a high apartment
window, find out they belonged to Cohen's mom!
Cohen has a good memory and a natural way with an
entertaining anecdote. There's the occasional bald spot
in his remarks, but nothing too bad.
Considering the low recommended price of only $15,
this DVD is a definite bargain buy for those who like
gritty urban exploitation. A
--Ken Begg
|