|
Volume 3, Issue 15
July 19 - August 1, 2001
STIMULUS/RESPONSE
Dear Stephanie,
There are some Dealbreakers you left
out of your article [www.gogomagazine.com/0312/sirenchat.html].
1. Women who wear too much make-up.
2. Men who have mullets.
3. And anyone who starts every sentence
with 'I'.
--Single for a reason
Dear Single for a reason,
So true! I can't believe I forgot the mullet,
although it's a good idea for everyone
to forget it. Thanks for the input.
Dear Saint Stephanie,
Yes, I believe you should be considered
for sainthood as perhaps one of our
most dedicated public servants...
"Dear Stephanie please help me tame
my toad-like boyfriend. He is a disgusting,
clueless oaf."
"Dear Stephanie I am a disgusting clueless
oaf. Please tell me how I can
become someone's toad-like boyfriend."
... aid for the clueless. Hope for the
hopeless. She toils on into the night.
"Here try something so basic you probably
really never thought of it before,
you clueless oaf. Bathe regularly. Don't
act like a toad and be nice." Trying to
list all the stupid ways men screw this
up she types until exhaustion. Yet still
her mind spins ahead. So many faux
pas, so few column inches. Her mind
wanders again. "Your boyfriend is a
clueless oaf. Try this and if he doesn't
get it shoot him." Venturing where no
advice columnist has ever gone before.
No case too hopeless. No man too toad-like.
She does her best for all. One can
only hope they're not too dumb to get it.
Saint Stephanie!
--Your biggest fan, Glenn
Dear Glenn,
I thank you for your compliments and,
might I add, incredible insight and razor
sharp observations. Unfortunately, not
all men see me in the same light. In fact,
some see my views and opinions as too
harsh. If only I could figure out a way to
know what the hell is going on and not
have that fact threaten the "masculinity"
of my less than confident readers. Here's a
fine example of someone lacking appreciation for
my wisdom....
Jane, you ignorant
slut. Are you the queen of contradiction
or what? I have just finished
reading your Dealbreakers column.
In this article you list no less than
eight things that disqualify men from
having a shot with you, you also dog
one for "laying it on too thick." Sound
familiar?
It's like you want men who are "real"
but not too real. I'm willing to bet whoever
that guy was who wrote all that
cheesy stuff would pass almost all your
tests. But is he real? Of course not. He's
being what he thinks you want him to
be.
I think your intentions are honorable,
trying to help us men not be quite the
pigs we are in general, but I really hope
for your sake you're not seriously looking
for a man that meets all that criteria. If you actually do find him, you
might be ecstatic at first, but you're definitely
setting yourself up for disappointment
down the road. No one can
live up to such high expectations.
Men need to be given the freedom to be
men and women need to appreciate that
fact. We do not want to be changed. I'm
even willing to bet that the men you are
attracted to most are NOT the ones that
bow to your every whim.
So go ahead and keep trying to whip us
into shape but just know that there are a
large percentage of us that will not conform
regardless of how hard you, or any
other woman for that matter, try. And
we'll STILL attract women every bit as
beautiful and smart as you.
--Nick
Dear Nick,
The name is Stephanie!
Typical of a man to mess that up, too.
But perhaps you are referring to a retro
"Saturday Night Live" skit, which my
friend, ages you and offers an explanation
for your archaic views.
Men have always imposed plenty of
requirements on women and as soon as
a woman returns the favor, it seems these
types of men cling even harder to their
pot bellies and dragon breath. If my expectations
are too high, then "Oh Well!" I'd rather be alone than
settle for any of the things I had in that
column, which by the way, were not that
stringent. Let's see, I believe they consisted
of bathing, brushing teeth and showing
respect for the woman you are with. Tall orders?
Nowhere in that magnificent piece did I
mention physical attributes, something
women are constantly judged on in addition
to character and personality, and
don't forget cooking and fucking skills.
Perhaps if my Dealbreakers consisted of
money, height, hair and penis size
requirements you would have a reason for
bitching, but since it was only common
sense hygiene and consideration, I suggest
you get back to sitting in front of the
television, scratching your stinky ass and
braiding your back hair.
E-mail Stephanie at sirenweb@aol.com
Siren Online
Steph's Place
|